First, classical realism states that by nature, humans are aggressive, intent on achieving self-advantage, and desire power over others. These theorists emphasize on two concepts. Realist theorists are the biggest advocates of the notion that conflict is inevitable, considering the current nature & structure of global politics. Thus, this report aims at analyzing the quote above, in addition to developing arguments that support that concept, and arguments that reject it, to gain a better understanding on the different views regarding that notion. insists on in the quote above, some aspects and structure of global politics have not changed since. There are countless conflicting views on the matter, with theories dating back to thousands of years ago. One major topic, political and economics analysts debate on, is whether conflict is inevitable given the nature and structure of global politics. Alliances, balances of power, and choices in policy between war and compromise have remained similar over the millennia.' There is certain logic of hostility, a dilemma about security that goes with interstate politics. Some aspects of international politics have not changed since Thucydides. Joseph Nye (2009) states: 'the world at the beginning of the twenty-first century is a strange cocktail of continuity and change. For years theorists have tried to conceive solutions to achieve international peace with no real achievement. Humanity has encountered endless conflicts, without ever experiencing any actual or real worldwide peace. From the beginning of times the world we live in always seems to contain wars and conflicts. Over millennial, the world has seen empires, governments, religions, ideologies and beliefs rise and fall.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |